Just a friendly reminder that we're still missing an IPMC vote ;-) Thanks !
Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I have fixed the LICENSE with the missing informations > and redeployed a release to the same staging area. > Hopefully we will find a better way to handle the license informations > (I've seen some generated informations using maven) for the next major > release and fix the generated license files somehow. > > Could everyone quickly review the changes ? > I won't start a new vote as only the LICENSE file has > changed, but I can if someone objects. > > robert burrell donkin wrote: > >> On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> robert burrell donkin wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just a friendly reminder. We're missing anoter IPMC vote ... >>>>> >>>> issues >>>> ------- >>>> >>>> i think that apache-servicemix-3.1.1-incubating.tar.gz has some >>>> libraries in lib that are missing their LICENSE/NOTICE entries (eg >>>> howl, jencks) >>>> >>> There are licensed under ASL 2.0 and don't have any NOTICE file afaik. >>> >> cool >> >> >>> Should all the jars be listed in the LICENSE / NOTICE file ? My >>> assumption >>> was that only those who had some attributions somehow or with a >>> different license >>> need to be, but correct me if I'm wrong. >>> >> it is safe to release without listing them (and if this were the only >> issue then i would probably have voted affirmatively) >> >> but the aim should be to allow people to understand the licensing of >> releases without need to ask questions or do research. if i don't >> understand the licensing then i will ask. so, it's a good idea to note >> the licenses for all jars since it avoids the need to answer questions >> like this... >> >> <snip> >> >> >>>> otherwise generally ok but i have a few questions >>>> >>>> source in >>>> >>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-jsr181-su/3.1.1-incubating/ >>> >>> >>>> lacks headers. is this going to be released? if so, are these >>>> generated? >>>> >>>> are the jars under >>>> http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.1.1-incubating/ going to >>>> be released? >>>> >>>> servicemix-wsn2005-3.1.1-incubating-sources.jar contains lots of java >>>> sources without headers (mostly under >>>> org.apache.servicemix.wsn.jaxws). is this going to be released? if so, >>>> are these generated? >>>> >>> Yeah, lots of these files are generated. Files generated are not in svn >>> so we usually check the headers on the svn tree rather than the source >>> jars generated by maven. These jars are not meant to be built for only >>> contain all the java sources for debugging purposes. If you want to >>> build these jars, you need to use the source distribution or use the svn >>> tag. >>> >> fine >> >> i hope to be a bit more prompt with the review next time >> >> - robert >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
