On Friday 28 September 2007 15:40, ant elder wrote: > Anyway, so i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden > style reviewer role.
*My* worry is that quality will drop if there is no expectations. So we could turn this around and say; What are the expectations from the I PMC reviewers? I happen to think that a smaller, new project should be given a much more lenient treatment, than the larger projects in their 5th release cycle. Should such distinction be ratified in policy? I don't think that is necessary. Personal judgement is IMHO enough on a case-by-case basis. Podlings are capable of making the review process smoother. Run RAT, publish the result, publish the "???" and protests of RAT, plus make a small list with explaination of why things are the way they are, just indicating that you are on top of the issue, and I think most of us would gladly pass thru less than perfect releases, since that shows you know what you are doing which is more important than doing it correctly. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
