I agree with Leo, a combination of e-mail and archived documentation would really be great and a time saver. Thanks for taking care of this!
Matthieu On Dec 30, 2007 2:37 AM, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > i'm a little worried about oversight of dist/incubator. incubator is a > > big group and there are lots of podlings. > > Yeah, I share the concern. I think we have 25 incubating projects at > the moment. We *have* to fundamentally change how we do releases at > some point. > > > i've been thinking about using a scanner on minotaur to collect > > information and collate it into a document. i had thought about > > running it monthly and posting it to this list but it might be long so > > this seems a little intrusive. > > *shrug*. The upside of dumping stuff to people in e-mail is that it > is most likely they look at it. > > > i now wonder whether it might be better > > to check the document into the incubator site as public documentation. > > each month, i'd generate a new monthly report, add it to the site and > > then post a summary email. (it's not as much work as it sounds since > > it should all be scriptable.) this means that a record of monthly > > distribution reports would be created in subversion and publically > > available from the site. > > That sounds good, too. I guess if it were me I'd make the email > actually contain the full report, too, for maximum social engineering > benefit. Or otherwise perhaps some facebook-style teaser, like > "project X has had suspicious-looking artifacts for Y months now, > perhaps you should read the <full report>?". > > > opinions? > > Go! :-) > > - Leo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
