Thanks for taking the time to look at this release and for these points. I won't have time to address them immediately. A couple of them I think I may not be issues, but I'm going to need to do a respin when I can get to it.
Kelvin. On 10/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/03/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Tuscany community had a vote to release SDO Java 1.1-incubatingrelease > > candidate 2 [1] which was passed with 7+1s and no -1s. > > > > Please vote to approve this release. > > > > The distribution files are at [2] > > Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [3] > > The tag for the release is at [4] > > > > The rat report is at - [5], [6] > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > Kelvin. > > > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28403.html > > > [2] http://people.apache.org/~amita/tuscany/1.1-RC2< > http://people.apache.org/%7Eamita/tuscany/1.1-RC2> > > -1: the source archive ought to have a NOTICE file alongside the > LICENSE file at the root. > > -0: The MD5 files use a non-standard format, which means that existing > utilities cannot check them. > > Instead of: > > apache-tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src.zip: > ED 69 2B B1 5E 6B 3C DB DD 18 08 0A 2A 9D 4D 9A > > they should be > > ED692BB15E6B3CDBDD18080A2A9D4D9A > > or > > ED692BB15E6B3CDBDD18080A2A9D4D9A * > apache-tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src.zip > > Note that the Maven MD5 files use a correct format (at least the ones > I checked). > > -0: the jar manifests ought to contain the Java source and target > versions. > And the Implementation-Version should reflect the actual version > > -0.5: the manifest in the binary zip is inadequate; it does not > contain any information on the product. > > > [3] http://people.apache.org/~amita/tuscany/1.1-RC2/maven< > http://people.apache.org/%7Eamita/tuscany/1.1-RC2/maven> > > -0.5: the jar manifests ought to contain the Java source and target > versions. And the correct Implementation-Version. > > > > [4] > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-incubating/ > > > -1: There should be LICENSE and NOTICE files at the root of the directory > tree. > > A README would also be useful, e.g. to say which Java version is > needed and how to build/install the software (or pointers to the > instructions). > > > [5] > > > http://people.apache.org/~amita/tuscany/1.1-RC2/rat-SDO-1.1-incubating-RC2.txt > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Eamita/tuscany/1.1-RC2/rat-SDO-1.1-incubating-RC2.txt > > > > [6] > > > http://people.apache.org/~amita/tuscany/1.1-RC2/rat-SDO-1.1-incubating-RC2-Exceptions.txt > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Eamita/tuscany/1.1-RC2/rat-SDO-1.1-incubating-RC2-Exceptions.txt > > > > > > -1: where is the KEYS file? This probably ought to be in SVN. Whoever > signed the files must add their public key to the file. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
