James is correct I went back and looked at the version of Rhino that is being used and it the 1.6 version and it is license under the Netscape Public License Version 1.1 http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/. We have supplied the diffs for the changes.
The use of Rhino is strictly for the dojo build system to work. Bob (Buffone) -----Original Message----- From: James Margaris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:56 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release That particular Rhino jar is the same one we've been using since the start, so I assume it is the old MPL one. James Margaris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:58 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> There seem to be several copies of some files, e.g. > > dojo.js.uncompressed.js > custom_rhino.jar > flash6_gateway.fla > Hmm, custom_rhino.jar is an interesting one. Prior to version 1.6R5, I believe Rhino was MPL licensed, and as of 1.6R5 it is dual licensed under MPL and GPL. It is coming to XAP through Dojo. Do we know which version of Rhino this is? If it's 1.6R5 or later, how does a dual MPL / GPL license work in an ASF project? Does the ASF have to pick one of the licenses, and are we allowed to do that? Can we distribute something that's potentially GPL licensed? -- Martin Cooper --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
