On 31/03/2008, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2008, sebb wrote: > > On 31/03/2008, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in > > > > SVN. > > > > May I suggest resolving this via Legal discuss? > > It's also pretty easy to add the two files to SVN... > > > Fine. We'll take that under advisement for 2.0.6 as legal-discuss and > other discussions figure it out. For 2.0.5, I don't think we should be > changing requirements in the middle of a vote. The current setup has > been fine for MANY releases from CXF and from other projects. Once > legal or whomever finalizes things, we can adjust, but that shouldn't > hold up the 2.0.5 release. >
I don't think it is a change of requirements, just that these requirements were not fully documented. See in particular: http://wiki.apache.org/legal/3party/notice/discuss ... [RoyFielding] Yes, the repository itself is a form of distribution > > > > > -1: SVN and the source archive don't agree; there are files and > > > > directories in each that are not in the other. > > > > I can understand why you may wish to omit the bin and benchmark > > directories, but I think consumers expect to find everything they need > > in the archives; it should not be necessary to retrieve additional > > files from SVN. > > > > Are the following directories really not needed in the source archive? > > > > distribution/src/main/release/samples/callback/build > > distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_policy/build > > distribution/src/main/release/samples/ws_rm/build > > > No. They are empty directories that shouldn't be in svn either. I've > gone ahead and deleted them on trunk. Will get the 2.0.x branch in a > bit. But it's pretty irrelevant for the 2.0.5 release. OK > > Also build.xml > Which is ONLY there for the cruisecontrol instance we have running inside > IONA. It's relatively specific to that machine and thus is not > something that should be "released" like the benchmark dir. It's a > specific file that is there to make sure the builds keep running > smoothly and devs don't break the build. OK > Dan > > > > > > Could you please reconsider your vote? AFAIK, we have always voted > > > on releases, not on the SVN tag. The tag is just a way to > > > (re-)build the release and not something we vote on and distribute. > > > Furthermore, there's no policies yet around these issues that are > > > still being discussed. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > ------------------------ > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer, IONA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
