On 01/04/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>  sebb wrote:
>  > The following do not seem to be test files, nor are they trivially short.
>  > So they should have AL headers please:
>  >
>  > core/src/main/resources/abdera.properties.example
>  > dependencies/deps.properties
>  >
>
>
> Done
>

Thanks

>  > The top level NOTICE file should not have the 4 line == header.
>
>
> Removed
>

Thanks

>  > Also, SVN includes the file
>  > 
> dependencies/i18n/src/main/java/org/apache/abdera/i18n/text/data/CompositionExclusions.txt
>  > which is not AL licensed; IMO it should be attributed in the NOTICE file.
>  >
>
>
> I've just removed the file completely as we actually no longer need it
>  at runtime. In the future, I plan to automate the process of downloading
>  and processing that file during the build process.
>

However the product still depends on the file - I don't think the fact
that the file is not in SVN makes any dfference.

>
>  - James
>
>
>  > Probably something needs to go in the LICENSE file as well
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On 01/04/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> I've added license headers to the build scripts and to the localization
>  >>  file and log4j.properties file. The rest I intend to leave as is.  Is
>  >>  that sufficient?  If so, we'll roll a new build.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  - James
>  >>
>  >>  sebb wrote:
>  >>  > On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >> In the FAQ I see this: "A file without any degree of creativity in
>  >>  >>  either its literal elements or its structure is not protected by
>  >>  >>  copyright law; therefore, such a file does not require a license 
> header.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Yes, but:
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>   If in doubt about the extent of the file's creativity, add the 
> license
>  >>  >>  header to the file."
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  Here's the breakdown that I see from Rat:
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  None of the build scripts contain license headers.  Given that the 
> build
>  >>  >>  scripts are everyday, normal maven build scripts, I do believe they
>  >>  >>  qualify under the "a file without any degree of creativity" clause.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > I disagree.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Note that all Commons poms include the AL header.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>   ? adapters/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? client/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? core/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? examples/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/gdata/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/geo/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/html/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/json/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/main/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/media/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/oauth/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/opensearch/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/serializer/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/sharing/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/wsse/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? security/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? server/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? spring/pom.xml
>  >>  >>   ? dependencies/deps.properties
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  The following file used to provide localization strings may possibly
>  >>  >>  require a license header.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>   ? core/src/main/resources/abderamessages.properties
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  The following are configuration files used at runtime, the majority 
> of
>  >>  >>  which consist of only a few lines of text and also fall under the 
> above
>  >>  >>  quoted clause.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>   ? client/src/main/java/log4j.properties
>  >>  >>   ? core/src/main/resources/abdera.properties.example
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >
>  >>  > These have less content, so the creative aspect is definitely lower.
>  >>  > However, I don't think there's no creativity involved.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  
> core/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory.example
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> core/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> core/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.converter.ConverterProvider
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> examples/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/complete/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.writer.NamedWriter
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/complete/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/complete/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.parser.NamedParser
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/html/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.parser.NamedParser
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/json/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.writer.NamedWriter
>  >>  >>  !?????
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/main/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/media/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/opensearch/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> extensions/sharing/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.writer.NamedWriter
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> contrib/rss/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org.apache.abdera.factory.ExtensionFactory
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Agreed.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  The following simple files are used for example purposes and do not
>  >>  >>  contain any creative content whatsoever.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>   ? examples/src/main/resources/xmlcontent.xml
>  >>  >>   ? examples/src/main/resources/log4j.properties
>  >>  >>   ? examples/src/main/resources/simple.xml
>  >>  >>   ? examples/src/main/resources/test.xslt
>  >>  >>   ? examples/src/main/resources/content.xslt
>  >>  >>   ? 
> examples/src/main/resources/org/apache/abdera/examples/appserver/web.xml
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Not much creativity, and small files, so the AL header is not 
> essential.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  The following were also (inappropriately) flagged by RAT
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/complete/resources/META-INF/LICENSE.htmlparser.txt
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/complete/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.htmlparser.txt
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/complete/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.serializer.txt
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/json/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE.htmlparser.txt
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/json/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.htmlparser.txt
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/json/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE.serializer.txt
>  >>  >>   ? dependencies/legal/servlet-api-LICENSE.txt
>  >>  >>   ? dependencies/legal/htmlparser-LICENSE.txt
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  The following resources are test resources that in addition to not
>  >>  >>  containing any degree of creative content, they arguably should not
>  >>  >>  contain license headers because the presence of the license header 
> could
>  >>  >>  potentially impact the results of the tests.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Probably.
>  >>  > Though if the AL header affects the parsing, then there may well be a
>  >>  > problem with the parsing...
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>   ? 
> adapters/hibernate/src/test/resources/abdera/adapter/hibernate.cfg.xml
>  >>  >>   ? 
> adapters/hibernate/src/test/resources/abdera/adapter/DummyData.hbm.xml
>  >>  >>   ? extensions/opensearch/src/test/resources/opensearch.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/nondefaultnamespace.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/nondefaultnamespace3.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/nondefaultnamespace2.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/xmlbase.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/ordertest.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/linktests.xml
>  >>  >>   ? 
> parser/src/test/resources/www.snellspace.com/public/contentsummary.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/simpleFeed.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/xmlcontent.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/feed.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/simple.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.feedparser.org/tests/wellformed/atom10/entry_content_base64_2.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.feedparser.org/tests/wellformed/atom10/entry_content_base64.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.feedparser.org/tests/wellformed/atom10/entry_author_email.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.feedparser.org/tests/wellformed/atom10/entry_author_name.xml
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> parser/src/test/resources/www.feedparser.org/tests/wellformed/atom10/atom10_namespace.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/complete.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/simpleService.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/simpleEntry.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/test.xslt
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/entry.xml
>  >>  >>   ? parser/src/test/resources/content.xslt
>  >>  >>   ? spring/src/test/resources/org/apache/abdera/spring/beans.xml
>  >>  >>   ? contrib/rss/src/test/resources/rss1.rdf
>  >>  >>   ?
>  >>  >>  
> adapters/hibernate/src/test/resources/abdera/adapter/hibernate.properties
>  >>  >>   ? security/src/test/resources/log4j.properties
>  >>  >>   ? server/src/test/resources/abdera/adapter/sample.properties
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  This one documentation file, which contains only a single one 
> sentence
>  >>  >>  statement, does not contain a license header.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>   ? docs/knownissues.txt
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  Which of these files do you think we absolutely have to add license
>  >>  >>  headers to?
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  - James
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  sebb wrote:
>  >>  >>  > On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >>  >> sebb wrote:
>  >>  >>  >>  > On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>> -1: There are MD5 and SHA1 digests in the directory, but the 
> archives
>  >>  >>  >>  > have no signatures.
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> OK, I will fix this.
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>>>  Maven Repository: 
> http://people.apache.org/~dandiep/abdera-take6/
>  >>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  > -0: The abdera-bundle-0.4.0-incubating-sources.jar does not 
> appear to
>  >>  >>  >>  > have any content - only the META-INF directory is present. Is 
> that
>  >>  >>  >>  > correct?
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> This is just a by-product of Maven. We can delete it.
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>> -1: The NOTICE files in that jar (and others) contains far too 
> much.
>  >>  >>  >>  > The NOTICE file is for required attribtions ONLY (e.g. as per 
> an About box)
>  >>  >>  >>  > There's really no need to repeat ASF for each project used by 
> Abdera.
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> Having too much information in the NOTICE files is not a crime. 
> The
>  >>  >>  >>  Maven remote-resources plugin aggregates all this stuff for us 
> so we
>  >>  >>  >>  never miss any notice that we need to put in.
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > Unfortunately the plugin generates incorrect information.
>  >>  >>  > It *is* a problem having all the redundant information.
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > See for example:
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>  >>  >>  > also
>  >>  >>  > http://wiki.apache.org/legal/3party/notice
>  >>  >>  > http://wiki.apache.org/legal/3party/notice/discuss
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>> -1: The LICENSE files need to either contain copies of the 3rd 
> party
>  >>  >>  >>  > licenses, or they need to have a reference to the 3rd party 
> licences.
>  >>  >>  >>  > Equally, there is no need for the lib directory to contain 
> copies of
>  >>  >>  >>  > the AL for every ASF product.
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> Why does the LICENSE file need to have a copy of all the other 
> licenses?
>  >>  >>  >>  These are contained in the lib/ directory like many other ASF 
> projects.
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > See the last paragraph of:
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  Re: the ASL license in lib/ - once again having too much 
> information is
>  >>  >>  >>  not a crime. This is a service to uesrs so they know where the 
> libraries
>  >>  >>  >>  came from.
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > I agree the source is useful, but the place for this is the 
> LICENSE file.
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>> -1: RAT report says:
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  > 99 Unknown Licenses
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  > Some of these are trivial, but most require an AL header.
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> Not true - there is not consensus that properties/xml files need 
> to have
>  >>  >>  >>  headers. All the Java source code files have headers. If there 
> are
>  >>  >>  >>  specific files that you feel should have a license that don't 
> please
>  >>  >>  >>  list them and explain why. I'm not saying that we didn't miss 
> something,
>  >>  >>  >>  but I am saying that the ones that I know about don't necessarily
>  >>  >>  >>  require a header.
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > Yes, they do, see:
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>> What is the SVN tag that corresponds with the archives?
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >> the branch will be tagged once its released.
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  Dan
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  --
>  >>  >>  >>  Dan Diephouse
>  >>  >>  >>  MuleSource
>  >>  >>  >>  http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  >>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  >>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to