On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/18/08, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Where do I commit the code and in what form? I have a kitten-auth.zip >> > file, should the zip file be committed or the unzipped code? >> apache needs a record of the checksummed artifact. this is likely to >> be the zipped code. > > I've attached it to a JIRA issue > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1610). > > But the IP-Clearance form asks for the code to reflect the new > copyright information: > > "Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been > updated to reflect the new ASF copyright."
AIUI that statement is incorrect > This means I shouldn't commit the zipped code, but the code itself, > modify it to make it ASF policy compliant, and then hold the > acceptance vote? the principle is very simple: apache needs to record the artifact that has the right checksum IMHO the best practice is to record the artifact in a JIRA and then commit the uncompressed code as is into a separate area before updating it. this ensures that the conversion process is recorded. >> (IMHO the process is too heavyweight and needs revision) > > Heavyweight is not the biggest problem. It is mostly confusing and > contradictory. IMO it's confusing and contardictory nature arises from it's weight - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
