Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Ralph Goers<ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> Using these projects as an example is perhaps not the best from a community >> perspective because Ceki has no intention of running them like Apache >> projects. But even if he did, by these standards the projects might never >> make it out of the incubator. Even if those of us who would like them had >> commit rights I can guarantee that 95% of the commits would still be Ceki's. > > I don't see it as a problem if the vast majority of commits comes from > one person (or company) as long as the community operates normally > *and* there are others who won't have to start learning how to build > the codebase and do an "svn commit" if the key developer leaves. > > That's why I measure the "three independent committers" criteria by > looking at the commit log instead of the asf-authorization file. And > I'm not asking much, just a few code commits in the past few months is > good enough for me. > > That's the criteria that I held Sling against, and that's also what's > currently keeping UIMA from graduating (and apparently also for over a > year before I signed up to help them). If the consensus is that this > is a bit too hard a requirement, then I'll be happy to bring UIMA up > for graduation in the next few months.
Indeed. If this is the way the wind is blowing right now, we're more than ready for graduation. --Thilo > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
