On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons <m...@leosimons.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for >> > testing? >> > If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary >> > release. >> >> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with >> putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the >> LICENSE file that do not apply is bad, though). > > I think it's confusing, and NOTICE is supposed to be as minimal as possible.
For the record, I was wrong, and here's the policy statement that confirms what Sebb said: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#notice-content "What Content Is Appropriate For The NOTICE File? Read [http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice]. Only mandatory information required by the product's software licenses. Not suitable for normal documentation." cheers, - Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
