The vote has closed and here is the tally:
+1: 17 votes: joe, dims, philip, niall, greg stein, chris,
gav, dan, noel, stefan, christian, mike, carl,
greg reddin, matt, justin, kevan
0: 0 votes
-1: 0 votes
Accordingly the vote has passed.
Thanks to everyone who participated!
----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wed, August 18, 2010 7:11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
>
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:44:08 PM
> > Subject: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
> >
> > I have come to the realization that I'm not
> > going to convince Noel to see things my way
> > any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
> > formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules
> > for the 3 aforementioned projects.
> >
> > Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
> > remove the current rule that requires 3 votes from
> > IPMC members to approve a vote on a new committer,
> > effectively delegating the decision to the PPMC.
> > Additionally the pre-ack would be removed, but no
> > other process changes are anticipated.
> >
> > Here's my +1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
