On 09/09/2010 07:15, Greg Stein wrote:
> Just to clarify: I'm assuming you're saying "+1 to the proposal",
> rather than to my comment. Correct?

+1 indeed, to the proposal

+1 actually, to the mailing list comment, too.

The Incubator PMC might consider that establishing sufficient interest
which requires a user list is an indicator of a project approaching the
exit criteria, or at least, making substantial progress.


p

> And to clarify for myself: I have no opinion on the proposal itself. I
> timed out after "Java" and the next few buzzwords. Thankfully, this
> proposal didn't say "framework" or I may have timed out after the
> first :-P ... my comments were focused on the community aspects around
> mailing list management, and successfully growing a lively and
> sustainable critical mass.
> 
> Cheers,
> -g
> 
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 02:06, Pid <p...@pidster.com> wrote:
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Small point: if a Mentor must be a Member, I can't be one, because I'm not.
>>
>>
>> p
>>
>> On 08/09/2010 16:00, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>>> +1 (Notbinding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks 
>>>> <matt...@matthewsacks.com>wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> *Mailing Lists*
>>>>>
>>>>> kitty-dev
>>>>> kitty-commits
>>>>> kitty-user
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
>>>> community across dev/user does not make sense. You want to keep the users
>>>> and developers on the same mailing list until one starts to overwhelm the
>>>> other. By partitioning the lists too early, you risk never reaching
>>>> "critical mass" on *either* mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -g
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 

Attachment: 0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to