Hello Richard, On 24 Sep 2010, at 17:21 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
> I think this is interesting. However, I'd like to point out that you may need > to take care in how you position this. I believe the OSGi specs allow for > compliant open source implementations, but it is unlikely this implementation > will ever be fully compliant. So, you'd probably be best to just position it > as a C-based module system that provides OSGi interoperability. Good point. I will get in touch with the OSGi Alliance to check with them how we should call this, but I'm fine rephrasing it according to your suggestion. In any case I will report back to the list when I get a response from them. > And definitely don't call the mailing lists cosgi anything. :-) That was a mistake, corrected now. Greetings, Marcel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
