On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 22:45, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:47, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> OK - Have they explicitly OK'd Apache Wave?  While Apache Wave would 
>>> certainly be unique to Apache, if Google intends to keep using Google Wave 
>>> (and Wave as a shorthand) this would get very confusing.
>>
>> Don't you think that by proposing Wave to the Incubator that Google
>> has OK'd this?
>
> I don't work for Google and don't know the people proposing this so no, I 
> have no idea whether Google has OK'd this.

Simple review: the original email was sent by Dan Peterson from his
google.com address. I imagine that if Google had a problem with it,
then he wouldn't be working there tomorrow :-D ... or if this was some
kind of spurious one-guy-goes-batshit-crazy, then how could he line up
so many people?

And sure, while you couldn't know this, Dan is a great guy. I worked
with him while at Google. This proposal is straight-up.

My simple point is: please accept proposals at face value rather than
pushing back with paranoid thoughts about malfeasance on the part of
the people wanting to join our efforts here at the ASF.

Cheers,
-g

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to