Bertrand, I agree. The good thing about a vibrant community is that they generally enforce this. All I'm saying is this shouldn't be a "must" requirement, rather it should be a shall and we can let the individual communities work out what exceptions they allow.
On Feb 5, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...I think it's important to keep things flexible because, as much as we >> would like everything to fit the same rules, some communities need to >> be a bit more dynamic and we need to trust the project PMC's and >> members to do what's best for the project and community. >> >> 72 hours is a good suggestion, but it shouldn't be mandatory... > > A PMC that consistently uses voting periods shorter than 72 hours > would disempower people who cannot check the project lists every day. > > So I think 72 hour must be the rule, though exceptions are ok as you mention. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
