Greg Stein wrote (04-06-11 06:31)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 21:07, Cor Nouws<oo...@nouenoff.nl> wrote:
[Picking a random mail in this thread]
I have a suggestion by the wiki-proposal.
I read
" Reliance on Salaried Developers
...
Ensuring the long term stability of OpenOffice.org is a major
reason for establishing the project at Apache.
"
Unless really relevant, I would suggest to leave that last sentence out. I
guess no need to explain why ;-)
Cor: I believe that you would need a better understanding of Apache,
or that you *do* need to explain why that sentence should be omitted.
Apologies. Was too obvious for me.
I read the sentence as arguing that TDF would not be a long term stable
solution. And since there still are some attempts to build bridges,
offensive suggestions have no place.
On the other side: I have not a single reason to suggest that the ASF is
not long term stable.
Cor
--
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
