On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, <robert_w...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Of course, this is not necessarily a problem for Apache. Think of it this > way. It would be perfectly possible, and actually quite easy for someone > to host the files with a scalable cloud storage provider, e.g., Amazon, > and charge $0.99 for the download, the cost of an iPhone app. That is > over $30 million/year. Heck, I might just do that myself and retire! >
For clarity, are you proposing that Apache should charge $1/download for OpenOffice.org, or are you proposing Apache should delegate downloads to an external organisation that does this? S.
