On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dan Haywood <dkhayw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...Relating to the NOTICE file, it would seem that [1] is inconsistent with >> [2]. If these discussions on legal did occur, then it would seem that >> no-one on the legal team updated [1] to reflect new policy. > > I think [1] is correct, the important bit is that NOTICE is for > *required* third-party notices, the idea is to minimize what's in > there. > > See also related discussions here: > http://markmail.org/message/ik3o5vl24o57lfsx > http://markmail.org/message/a5xkiggxirc77xnv
(Thanks for digging out these links 8-) This is the way I understand the situation as well >> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >> [2] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-32 IMO generating and verify that assembled applications have correct LICENSE and NOTICE attributes is not trivial, and requires tooling beyond remote-resources... Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
