Svn dump & private download for concerned party? On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:23 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Noel J. Bergman <n...@devtech.com> wrote: >>> Er, have you explicitly told the Bluesky lists that the repo is about to >>> be deleted? >> >>> Alternatively, we can simply turn off write access [to] ensure it's not >>> actively developed, but that it's available. >> >> Are we deleting or moving to an attic-type section? > > If we don't have something saying that we have a license to the code, > then I think we should delete. > > Normal Attic practice is to leave the svn where it is and make it > read-only; so for retired podlings for which we do have copyright > signoff I suggest simply doing that. > > Noting that bluesky svn is now read-only (dev list cc'd). > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
