>>> The ones I noticed were in headings, but there could now (or in the >>> future) be other instances that are not in headings. >> >> well, I *hope* this will not be the case. Otherwise there will be >> exceptions on the page which finally leads into chaos. > > Not sure I follow.
No worries, my comment was not so important > > What exceptions? > > <a name="xyz"> used to be the standard way to create anchors in HTML > files, so why should that cause an exception? I meant, we use tocs which lead to h2 anchors only. If somebody would start to make anchors without putting it into a heading, that would be an exception to what we have now. If it is only one, ok, but if there are many... > >>> We should use the fix suggested above in combination with the selector. >>> If the browser does not support the selector, at least headings will >>> still look OK. >> >> +1 >> >>> I'm working on a JIRA to document this; I'll attach my site.vsl patch >>> in case we later have to (or want to) use ids in header tags instead. >> >> Sounds good >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
