On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine. >> >> It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here >> (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for >> other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release >> artifact. You could then create "convenience artifacts" off that. > > Having multiple archive types is very common in other ASF projects. >
Ok, but that means that we need to verify/vote on both, correct? (we can do them together, I'm just saying that it requires more reviewer work than just verifying the single artifact). >> I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are exactly the >> same, just differing archiving tools. > > Or possibly also differing in EOL setting, e.g. > Windows more commonly has zip support, so source may have EOL=CRLF > Un*x systems more commonly support tar/gz, so source may have EOL=LF. In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference btw the contents of the two archives (which makes verification simpler). Patrick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
