On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/11/2012 6:02 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: >> On Jan 11, 2012, at 23:49 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >>> -1 for forwarding no the following reports from projects that are over >>> a year old and lacking crisp plan for graduatuation: >>> >>> Celix >> >> A plan is being discussed on the list, but did not make it into this month's >> report. I would kindly like to ask the board to accept delaying that plan >> until the next report. If that is too long, we can report about it next >> month? WDYT? > > That's exactly what Sam is describing. Pull the incomplete report (Noel > could choose to do so) and submit a more comprehensive report next month. > No harm no foul.
Ok, so I will: a) wait to see if Noel pulls this months report completely; b) either report next month or when the next report is due in three months. The only point I was trying to make is that, as soon as discussions here were going in a direction where podlings over a year old should start coming up with a more concrete plan for graduation, I started this discussion on the Celix list as well. However, due to some vacations, that discussion has started attracting responses only this week. So it's just a timing issue, the community is aware and dealing with it. This board report just came a bit too soon. Greetings, Marcel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
