On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > On 01/13/2012 09:53 AM, ant elder wrote: >> >> I've had a look, the only issue i see is I don't think the NOTICE file >> in the binary distribution is correct as it has many things which i >> expect are not required. When we last discussed this on general@ we >> said this is not strictly a blocking problem, so >> >> +1 > > > Thanks for the review and vote ant, much appreciated. > > >> >> but i think you should do a complete review of whats in the NOTICE >> file with your mentors and remove everything which doesn't need to be >> there. > > I'm curious what in your opinion doesn't need to be in the NOTICE file. > I might have missed some recent discussions on this topic here, but AFAIK > all those notices are required. > Or did the guidelines really change dramatically recently? >
See this email [1] for an answer to a similar question, also there is now a definition of required third party notices at [2]. In a nutshell, very few things actually require mention in the NOTICE file, and best not to unless there is a reason to. ...ant [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201111.mbox/%3CCAJO%2BUbvDfOib7FnQpJPtVcMJKDvBPRHpAG4%3DbEO3Vmy4w4reFA%40mail.gmail.com%3E [2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
