Ok, thanks. So I withdraw this release candidate, address CLEREZZA-682 and will propose RC6 asap.
Reto On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>wrote: > 2012/2/3 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org> > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding > > +1 > > > in > > > > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect > NOTICE > > > and > > > > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of > > > modules > > > > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate > > fixes > > > > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the > assembly > > > > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules > > not > > > in > > > > the release profile. > > > > > > > > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the > > > modules in > > > > the release profile. > > > > > > > > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb > > launcher > > > > are available with their signatures at: > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/ > > > > > > > > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Reto > > > > > > I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks > > > good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though. > > > > > > > I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary > > assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to > address > > this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just > > releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho) > > > > > > > > The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source > > > distribution containing different modules to which different notices > > > from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders > > > of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention > > > licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the > > > LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the > > > text as it is though. > > > > > I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to > remark > > that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more > explicit > > than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix). > > > > > > > > > > Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone > > > here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in > > > the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure > > > you'll get the necessary votes. > > > > > > > While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no > > feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them > > individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso > we > > had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that > you > > would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been > fixed. > > > > The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the > > missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should > > exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the > > source distro). > > > > > I think the best option would be to fix the NOTICE in binary, fire a new RC > and release the binary stuff too because releasing only the source > package, in my opinion, would be not that convenient in terms of using > Apache Clerezza as devs couldn't take the binary neither from ASF mirrors > nor from Maven Central. > WDYT? > > Tommaso > > > > > Cheers, > > Reto > > > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >