On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>> From my perspective, Chris's proposal and Benson's vote above
>> effectively turned this into a single issue question: is now the time
>> for Noah to be replaced by Jukka?
>>
>> There are no question that all four individuals in question are great
>> guys.  However despite the protestations to the contrary, all
>> available evidence at the present time show that Jukka has more time
>> available to devote to the Incubator.  This means that we have here a
>> (possibly only modestly incremental) improvement, and one that is
>> readily reversible if necessary.  What's not to like?
>>
>
> I'd still like a definitive list of who is running and a "real"
> vote that includes all candidates. Is the presumption that Jukka
> is the only candidate valid??

Not as far as I can find...

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201202.mbox/%3ccmeclhigikfcophdfpnooeifpaab.n...@devtech.com%3E

--tim

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to