On May 1, 2012, at 11:18 AM, sebb wrote: > On 1 May 2012 14:54, Suresh Marru <sma...@apache.org> wrote: >> This is the first incubator release for Apache Airavata, with the artifacts >> being versioned as 0.2-incubating. >> >> We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have >> received 2 binding Mentors/IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on >> airavata-dev: >> >> Community VOTE & RESULT Thread : http://markmail.org/thread/5vcfvyezsfzzgfd2 >> >> Mentors/IPMC member votes from the Airavata-Dev list: >> Ate Douma: +1 >> Chris Mattmann: +1 >> >> Detailed change log/release notes: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/tags/airavata-0.2-incubating/RELEASE_NOTES >> >> All Release Artifacts: >> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 617DDBAD): >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/KEYS >> >> Specific URL's: >> >> SVN source tag (1330645): >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/airavata/tags/airavata-0.2-incubating/ >> >> Source release: >> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/airavata-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip >> >> Binary Artifacts: >> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/apache-airavata-0.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz >> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/airavata/0.2-incubating/RC6/apache-airavata-0.2-incubating-bin.zip > > The NOTICE file in the binary archive contains the following: > > ========================================================================= > == NOTICE file corresponding to section 4(d) of the Apache License, == > == Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Airavata distribution. == > ========================================================================= > > This definitely should not be present. > > There are lots of other entries in the NOTICE file; it's not clear to > me whether they are all needed or not. > AIUI, the NOTICE file should only contain *required* notices (whereas > the LICENSE file should contain ALL applicable licenses)
Hi Sebb, For the past few months we were too focussed on making sure we include all the required notices and in the process we ended up with more than whats needed. We tried to minimize these extra notices as much as possible, but not quite there yet. Do you see this as a blocker for this release? To get the License, Notice files right, we branched a stable version and trunk moved too far ahead. If this extra notices are not too critical blockers, we would like to wrap this release and merge back to trunk and address the unnecessary notice information. Will that be acceptable? Thanks, Suresh >> Maven staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheairavata-108/ >> >> Please verify the artifacts and vote. The vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
