Henri, Ant pointed out that Kato released. Where is the signoff you are looking at?
--benson On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >>> The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: >>> >>> 2009-02-09 kato >>> 2009-02-13 stonehenge >>> 2009-05-13 socialsite >>> 2010-05-19 amber >>> 2010-09-05 nuvem >>> 2010-11-12 kitty >>> 2010-11-24 stanbol >>> 2011-06-13 openofficeorg >>> >>> Said checklist item is: >>> >>> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF >>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the >>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. " >> >> IIRC, there was no code grant/donation for Kitty. So, there was no code >> grant. If that means I should indicate the 'papers have been received', I >> can do that. > > Thanks Kevan :) > > I've updated kitty.xml to say n/a rather than a date as that's the > method that's been used in the past to identify no need for > grant/donation. > > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
