The vote did not pass, and he reopened it already. The vote was shy by 1 binding IPMC vote. I gave it a binding +1 a couple of days ago. It should be good now, it just needs another result message, this time showing the 3 IPMC votes. On Aug 12, 2012 4:50 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <f...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need > 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps > comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual: > > "The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members > and more +1's than -1's. " > > which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC. Some > e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way, though, and we > need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please? > > -Flavio > > On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the > > vote deadline: > > > > +1: 7 (5 binding) > > -1: 0 > > > > Details: > > > > +1 IPMC: > > acmurthy, phunt > > > > +1 PPMC > > kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj > > > > +1 wider community > > Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla > > > > > > Thanks to all the participants to the voting process! > > > > I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the > > websites and send announcements. > > > > Matthieu > > > > > > (* voted on s4-dev list) > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
