Hello Juan, According to your answers, I suggest the following (IMHO, not binding anyway) 1) remove licenses for files which are not included into the source release (this actually means the source release license file should be different from the binary release one); 2) remove the second copy for any LICENSE (the one under doc/); 3) for the binary release, make the artifact list complete, so it would contain the reference to Mozilla licensed file and other missed entities.
-- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez <juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alexei, > > activation-1.1.jar et al are downloaded as part of the build. They're not > included in the source because that's contrary to the Apache principles. > That was noted in our July report (and tracked at [#1]). > > Regarding the LICENSE / doc/LICENSE.* files: initially, we kept each > license in a separate file (doc/LICENSE.*), while ./LICENSE contained only > the AL. This raised some concerns, noted on our 3rd RC vote [#2], which led > to ./LICENSE file also having verbatim copies of all used licenses. As for > the Mozilla license, it's in the ./LICENSE file (line 1090 onwards), we use > custom-rhino in some of the tests, which uses that license. > > > cheers, > juan pablo > > p.d.: your vote being..? O:-D > > [#1]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-738<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13419501#comment-13419501> > [#2]: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201210.mbox/%3c80852492-ac42-4f8d-82ca-760eefccd...@oracle.com%3E > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Alexei Fedotov > <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Great work! >> >> I've got the following questions concerning the ./LICENSE file for the >> source release: >> >> There is a list of jar files in the ./LICENSE file of the following form: >> activation-1.1.jar doc/LICENSE.cddl >> >> What is the point of including licenses for files which are absent in >> the source release? >> Why license texts appear twice (both in the ./LICENSE file and ./doc/ >> folder)? That provides more place for possible errors. >> I believe the list is good to exist in the ./LICENSE file for the >> binary release. Why it does not mention all licenses from the source >> release ./LICENSE file, e.g. Mozilla license? >> >> How to understand "Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>" in MIT >> license. The template style cannot appear in final version of the >> LICENSE. Also, IMHO, copyright attribution does not belong to the >> license (unless you use a copyrighted license). >> >> -- >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >> http://dataved.ru/ >> +7 916 562 8095 >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Florian Holeczek <flori...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'd like to start a vote on an incubator release for Apache JSPWiki, >> version >> > 2.9.0-incubating. >> > >> > Apache JSPWiki (incubating) is a leading open source WikiWiki engine, >> > feature-rich and built around standard J2EE components (Java, servlets, >> > JSP). >> > >> > >> > A vote was held on the developer mailing list [1] and passed with 9 "+1"s >> > [2], two of them from our mentors. >> > >> > >> > This release candidate fixes the following issues: >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310732&version=12319521 >> > >> > The tag to be voted upon: >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jspwiki/tags/jspwiki_2_9_0_incubating >> > >> > Source and binary files: >> > http://people.apache.org/~florianh/jspwiki-2.9.0-incubating/ >> > >> > Checksums: >> > >> > JSPWiki-2.9.0-incubating-src.zip >> > MD5: 287e75857b03b41dca769211591c6144 >> > SHA1: 74b24e526177b7ddf5394b4b96b67bb9081628a4 >> > SHA512: >> > >> 9a080ed994e4308e4ff6386f6e5e88e42d27fc8a8abe37d2874d3c8477fe097037017fffdd03430cdb0ca7a73efba91bf58e70c1943e08c9565170809daa953a >> > >> > JSPWiki-2.9.0-incubating-bin.zip >> > MD5: 7e774dc46c112ca895aad60fb607dc60 >> > SHA1: e529eb02d13f4061534d85dd0e78d67c5dfe29a5 >> > SHA512: >> > >> 575eae72390178005bf7cf57332af9a1da85515d6fc10cf9c8b3548f50743c0e57c0c6f46bc99b70cd1328ef083fb4a4fe9f3867e9ec7c7e4a640b845a2e2ee4 >> > >> > JSPWiki's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >> > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jspwiki/KEYS >> > >> > For convenience, this directory includes a binary distribution and a RAT >> > report on the cited tag. >> > You can manually generate the RAT report from a clean source by running >> the >> > "rat-report" Ant target. >> > >> > >> > Please vote: >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve, release Apache JSPWiki 2.9.0-incubating >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and giving a reason) >> > >> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > Best regards >> > Florian Holeczek >> > >> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/gksvnjnru2nhhenf >> > [2] http://markmail.org/message/mht24dwvpmm7xgft >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
