On 18.01.2013 11:39, sebb wrote: > On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos <ryan.ol...@wandisco.com> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4 >> (incubating) >> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC. >> >> The vote PPMC vote thread: >> http://markmail.org/message/d2yvz2tx5pj57ru4 >> >> Please find the change log for this proposed release below: >> >> * Replaces ticket edit form with a new 'in-place' edit and workflow control >> * Added white-labeling for error messages and basic branding >> * Improvements to the quick ticket creation form including ability to >> specify the select fields and their order >> * Various bug fixes >> >> * Not fixed for this release: >> * No major outstanding issues >> >> The release candidate artifacts consist of source release as a tar.gz >> archive along with the associated MD5 and GPG signature. >> These can be found at: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/ >> >> The archive is based on the tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.4-incubating > The LICENSE file looks good. > > However I'm not sure that the NOTICE file is correct. > > Are all the entries in NOTICE required?
Bloodhound builds upon Trac and uses Bootstrap and JQuery -- and includes all of them in the source release, so yes, I believe all the entries are required. > If they are required, are they correct, i.e. is the correct > attribution included? As far as I can see, it's all correct. Which one(s) do you find incomplete? (FWIW, neither the NOTICE file nor the used external modules have changed since the previous release.) -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
