I'd love to be involved if you're actively looking for initial committers. I'm very familiar with OSGi, puppet, and the Hadoop ecosystem side of things. I'm (non-binding) +1 on accepting the project to the incubator.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone else interested to join? > > We are still looking for mentors / initial contributor. If you are working > with OSGi, Karaf, Activiti, > Cloud APIs or Puppet it would be great to have you on-board as a mentor or > contributor. > > I am at ApacheCon in Portland - feel free to get in touch if you want to > know more. > > -- Andrei Savu > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I think the following presentation does a better job at explaining the > > scope of Provisionr: > > > > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/savu.andrei/creating-pools-of-virtual-machines-apachecon-na-2013 > > > > Regards, > > > > -- Andrei Savu > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Tom White <tom.e.wh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Tom do you want to be a champion for this proposal? > >> > > >> > Yes, I'd be happy to. > >> > > >> > One thing I think is worth discussing more here is whether Provisionr > >> > should be a TLP on graduation, or whether it should be a module in > >> > Whirr. > >> > >> > >> Well, that puts this proposal into a gray area. In case you haven't > >> been reading all the traffic on this list, I'll give a quick summary > >> here. > >> > >> Historically, the Foundation had 'subprojects', and the the incubator > >> hosted podlings intended, eventually, to become subprojects of > >> existing TLPs. We don't do that anymore. If Provisionr becomes part > >> of Whir, it just becomes, well, part of Whir. > >> > >> That raises the question of what you need the incubator for if this is > >> your goal. There's a pretty simple alternative. The existing > >> Provisionr team works with Whir to do an IP grant of the code to the > >> Foundation. The existing team submits ICLAs. Whir makes a branch or > >> other distinctive tree in source control and grants the Provisionr > >> team commit access _to that tree_. Over time, the Provisionr people > >> earn full committer status by merit, and appropriate adjustments are > >> made to the tree structure. > >> > >> Given the state of the conversation about policy on this subject, I > >> think it would be reasonable to ask you all to talk to the Whir people > >> about this, and see if you an all come to an agreement for something > >> like this in parallel with a discussion here. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com
