On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I am under the impression that having a low-volume, high-signal >> announcement channel is generally beneficial to most projects that try it. > > I agree that such lists are useful. I like to subscribe to individual > announce lists for security purposes because aggregate lists like > debian-security-announce generally lag behind upstream. Individual dev lists > and announce@a.o are too high traffic and programming text-based filters is > tricky because conventions like "ANNOUNCE" are not adhered to 100% of the > time. >
Do the general announce list lag behind because there are individual lists ? > As to whether such lists should be encouraged for new podlings (probably by > putting a stub in the proposal template alongside the other lists), I can't > say that I have a strong opinion. > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
