And here is my +1 I'll prepare the result mail.
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/10/1 Tammo van Lessen <tvanles...@gmail.com> > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Tammo > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2013/9/30 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Monday, September 30, 2013, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > > > Cc: > > > > > Sent: Monday, 30 September 2013, 6:52 > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] BatchEE as an incubated project > > > > > > > > > > Since discussion about the BatchEE seems done, I'd like to call a > > vote > > > > for > > > > > BatchEE to > > > > > become an incubated project. > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is pasted below, and also available at: > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BatchEEProposal > > > > > > > > > > Let's keep this vote open for three business days, closing the > voting > > > on > > > > > Thursday 10/03. > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept BatchEE into the Incubator > > > > > [ ] +0 Don't care. > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't accept BatchEE because... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = BatchEE, JBatch Implementation = > > > > > > > > > > === Abstract === > > > > > > > > > > BatchEE will be an ASL-licensed implementation of the JBatch > > > > Specification > > > > > which is defined as JSR-352 (for version 1.0). > > > > > > > > > > === Proposal === > > > > > > > > > > BatchEE specification is an effort for defining a standard API and > > way > > > to > > > > > write batches in Java. It is integrated with JavaEE (JTA, CDI....) > > but > > > > > works out of the box in a standalone environment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BatchEE Project is responsible for implementing the runtime > container > > > > > contract for the JBatch specification. Besides the implementation, > > > > BatchEE > > > > > Project will implement the core built-in components that further > > > > simplifies > > > > > the developer complex interactions with other Java EE specific > > > enterprise > > > > > operations. For example, it will define default > > reader/processor/writer > > > > for > > > > > jdbc, jpa, xml/json/flat files... > > > > > > > > > > === Background === > > > > > > > > > > Until today writing batches in java meant using a proprietary > > framework > > > > and > > > > > link to JavaEE was quite limited (or missing). JBatch defines an > API > > > > fixing > > > > > this issue and now developpers need a fix. > > > > > > > > > > === Rationale === > > > > > > > > > > Current JBatch specificatin is released, and only the reference > > > > > implementation is available but not really intended to be > maintained. > > > > > Moreover multiple Apache projects (geronimo, TomEE, ...) will need > an > > > > > Apache compatible Jbatch implementation to go ahread and implement > > > > JavaEE 7. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === Initial Goals === > > > > > > > > > > The initial goals of the BatchEE Project are > > > > > > > > > > * Fully implement the JSR-352 specification. > > > > > * Attracts a community around the current code base. > > > > > * Active relationship with the other dependent projects to further > > > > develop > > > > > some useful batch components. > > > > > > > > > > == Current Status == > > > > > > > > > > === Meritocracy === > > > > > > > > > > Initial developer of the project is familiar with the meritocracy > > > > > principles of Apache. He knows that the open source gets power from > > its > > > > > great developers and freedom. He also developed some other open > > source > > > > > projects. We will follow the normal meritocracy rules also with > other > > > > > potential contributors. > > > > > > > > > > === Community === > > > > > > > > > > There is a great community within the OpenEJB, OpenWebBeans, > Geronimo > > > and > > > > > TomEE Apache projects. BatchEE project is very related with these > > > > projects > > > > > and in the some cases, it enhances these projects. We are thinking > > that > > > > > BatchEE project gets strong community because it complete the > needed > > > > > frameworks of a java developper and unifies the using of these > > > projects. > > > > It > > > > > simplifies the developer effort for building complex enterprise > > > > > applications batches. > > > > > > > > > > === Core Developers === > > > > > > > > > > BatchEE project has been developing by the IBM then forked by > Romain > > > > > Manni-Bucau as a sole contributor. > > > > > > > > > > === Alignment === > > > > > > > > > > BacthEE project will be a candidate for use in Geronimo AS and > TomEE > > > as a > > > > > default JBatch implementation. Other projects could benefit from > the > > > > > BatchEE project as a general purpose component and context > > management. > > > > > > > > > > BatchEE project is closely aligned with the OpenEJB and > OpenWebBeans > > > > > projects perfectly. It depends on these projects to satisfy its > > > > > requirements (mainly tests). > > > > > > > > > > == Known Risks == > > > > > > > > > > === Orphaned products === > > > > > > > > > > Even if the initial committer of the project has no plan to leave > the > > > > > active development, it must > > > > > > > > > > necessa--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > <javascript:;> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile > > > > > > > > > -- > Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de >
