Hey Nick
I spoke with Tammo about this while we had a virtual coffee recently.
However I don't know about similar cases so much. Basically I don't see
lot of risk from
a legal standpoint and would give my +1 quickly.
But of course it would be interesting for me about the motivations.
I mean, the project was almost dead and now a few people want it to be
revived. Why? Was
the problem in the previous project to less interest? Problems in the
community?
As I said, this would be interesting but personally I don't consider
this information necessary.
What I don't know: do the current resources need to move to an
*.incubator.a.o space?
I believe this is unnecessary overhead, but maybe other have an idea on
that too.
So far, I would +1 this proposal. Mentors good, Champion good and people
come from the community. Legals are all done and almost no resources
will be wasted to set this up.
Cheers
On 24 Oct 2013, at 17:26, Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
I'm currently helping the XMLBeans community put together a proposal
to reboot their project, which is otherwise destined for the attic.
However, while I've helped a few new projects enter the incubator in
the past, I've never tried helping with a reboot. As such, I'm not
quite sure if the initial proposal is quite right or not.
Do we have any guidance on what a reboot proposal should and shouldn't
contain?
If not, any chance people could cast any eye over the proposal, and
either fix stuff if they can, or flag it for work if not? The proposal
is at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/XMLBeansProposal
Thanks
Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
