Oh well, I went ahead and implemented this :3

GitHub comments that either include a JIRA ticket name or are made on a
PR whose title includes a JIRA ticket name, will result in a comment
being made in that specific JIRA ticket, similar to what is posted on
the ML. This will result in some double posting, as you'll get both a
GitHub email and a JIRA email on the ML when this happens. If you don't
want this, lemme know and I can filter your project out.

We will not make it so that new tickets are created, you'll have to
create a ticket first before this will work. This is an old policy
decision that I'm not going to go 180 on just yet.

With regards,
Daniel.

On 02/10/2014 02:49 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> cc'ing infra, as this is really an infra topic.
> Yes, it is possible - anything is possible, but it will require quite a
> lot of work from Infra to make this possible.
> 
> I would suggest you create a new JIRA ticket with this _wish_ and label
> is as Git+Wilderness, and I'll try to figure out whether we can support
> this or not.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel.
> 
> On 02/10/2014 02:44 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>> Daniel & Jake,
>>
>> This is simply nice, appreciate your efforts in integrating this on a quick 
>> turn around. Can I become more greedy and ask a follow on question/request?
>>
>> In addition to (or arguably in place of) dev list emails, is it possible to 
>> have ASF JIRA tickets updated with github PR’s? I mean similar to git and 
>> svn commits if a pull request is created with a title including issue number 
>> (like PROJECT-XXXX), then it might be useful to have a comment added to the 
>> JIRA. This of course raises another question of duplicate emails to the dev 
>> list for these PR's. 
>>
>> I am looking to address this scenario: A contributor would like to provide a 
>> patch to an issue created in a project JIRA; creates a github PR; all 
>> discussion of PR is recorded on the JIRA; once a consensus (direct or 
>> assumed lazy) is reached, a committer/pmc member will merge the PR closing 
>> both github PR and resolving JIRA.
>>
>> Comments on usefulness of this? I am sure I am missing something here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Suresh
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Daniel Gruno <rum...@cord.dk> wrote:
>>
>>> Let me just get some information across to podlings wondering about this
>>> new GitHub stuff we've added, and what is supported so far:
>>>
>>> - It is now possible to relay new GitHub PRs, comments on PRs and
>>> closing/reopening of PRs to your mailing list.
>>>
>>> - It is also possible for all committers in a project to close PRs with
>>> a commit message to the master/trunk branch of a project saying, for
>>> instance, "this closes #1234 on GitHub" in the commit message.
>>>
>>> - This GitHub feature is currently only supported for projects/podlings
>>> that have their primary source repository in Git. If you have an SVN
>>> mirror instead, we are not fully able to support GitHub PR relaying at
>>> the time being, but will support it in the near future.
>>>
>>> - You have to request PR comments to be enabled for your project,
>>> preferably via a JIRA ticket (at
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA ). By default, hooks have
>>> been set up so that only PR opening/closing gets passed on. New setups
>>> will include relaying of comments, but if your project has been set up
>>> for a web hook in the past, you must request it be set up with comment
>>> notification. This is a new default setting, and all projects that now
>>> request PR notifications will automatically receive comments on PRs in
>>> their respective mailing list as well. If you are unsure whether your
>>> project is set up for relaying GitHub messages (and you want this), make
>>> a new JIRA ticket to have it set up, rather one ticket too many than one
>>> too few.
>>>
>>> - Comments _should_ now be nested, so that each new comment has an email
>>> reference to the original PR issue, meaning they will nest in mod_mbox
>>> and your email client if you have nesting/threading enabled.
>>>
>>> - We may, in the future, add the possibility to filter out certain
>>> comments from being relayed to the ML (such as jenkins workflows etc),
>>> but this will all depend on how this initial phase goes along.
>>>
>>> With regards,
>>> Daniel.
>>>
>>> On 02/07/2014 10:02 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>> We had a bit of a snafu on adding PR titles to the subject lines, but
>>>> it's been taken care of now.
>>>>
>>>> With regards,
>>>> Daniel.
>>>>
>>>> On 02/07/2014 09:57 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>>>>> Ah looks like the missing PR title only happen for the emails
>>>>> describing comments from the Github pull requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Henry
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jake,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like all the emails from the PR has the same subject:
>>>>>> "[GitHub] incubator-spark pull request:"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a way to get the Title of the pull request included in the
>>>>>> Subject line?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Henry
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> I just wanted to follow up on my previous comments about the Github
>>>>>>> webhooks not posting comments, Daniel Gruno and I have been debugging 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Github webhooks we had in place to send pull request notifications and 
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> have fixed it so comments for issues and pull requests will now go to 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> dev@ lists. If anyone replies to this mail it will stay on the dev@ 
>>>>>>> list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Jake
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOTE: This still remains a project/PMC responsibility to ensure
>>>>>>> communication is recorded as this is coming from a 3rd party we do not
>>>>>>> control. Communications should be encouraged to occur on our mailing 
>>>>>>> lists.
>>>>>>> We (infra) are working to make things easier and allow for better
>>>>>>> integrations and are always open to anyone wanting to help contribute to
>>>>>>> these efforts.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to