+1 (binding). - Checked the src and binary artifacts. - Checked sigs - Checked CRCs - Built the src artifacts
If the DISCLAIMER file will not sink the RC, lets go ahead with releasing this. Otherwise we would need a new RC. Enis On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>wrote: > Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like to > follow the preferred path. > > With these changes for our next release, are we good to go for this > release? > > Thanks, > James > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com > >wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > Also, should we drop the ".txt" > > > extension on the NOTICE and LICENSE files for our next release? > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name > > > > Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt? > > > > This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called > > LICENSE and NOTICE. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >