+1 (binding).

- Checked the src and binary artifacts.
- Checked sigs
- Checked CRCs
- Built the src artifacts

If the DISCLAIMER file will not sink the RC, lets go ahead with releasing
this. Otherwise we would need a new RC.

Enis


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>wrote:

> Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like to
> follow the preferred path.
>
> With these changes for our next release, are we good to go for this
> release?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com
> >wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Also, should we drop the ".txt"
> > > extension on the NOTICE and LICENSE files for our next release?
> >
> >   http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name
> >
> >   Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?
> >
> >     This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called
> >     LICENSE and NOTICE.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to