+1 binding.

Enis


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Diversity and 'nonpartisan' governance will be critical for graduating a
> security project, in my opinion, so it will be important to monitor the
> attention and openness in community development during incubation.
>
> Although the folks behind Argus do not wish to join Apache Sentry
> (incubating) or take up any of its artifacts, I encourage both communities
> to find common ground and take some sort of productive common steps. In my
> opinion, evidence of that would go a long way toward addressing concerns
> like the above when and if it is time to consider graduation - of either
> project.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a
> > new Incubator project.
> >
> >  The proposal draft is available at:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included
> >  below.
> >
> >  Vote is open for 72h and closes at 24 July 2014 at 10am PST.
> >
> >  [ ] +1 accept Argus in the Incubator
> >  [ ] +/-0
> >  [ ] -1 because...
> >
> > I'm +1.
> >
> > .. Owen
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to