On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> This strikes me very similar to providing access to daily SNAPSHOT binary >> artifacts. I would argue that labeling it appropriately is all you >> need. > Except that is this case the intended audience of the application is users.
I see no difference between the two cases. Regardless of who the target audience is SNAPSHOT is a SNAPSHOT is a SNAPSHOT. Look at it this way: there are *tons* of users depending on SNAPSHOT Maven artifacts of various Apache projects. >> After all, if you're pushing updates it means that something that used to >> work yesterday >> could stop working today. > That's generally not the case here, we are publishing compiled code that runs > in the flash player VM. I was trying to make a general point that regardless of a technology, if I come to the same website clearly labeled as '1.0 release' and get different results -- I'd be unpleasantly surprised. There's a reason Google labels things as 'beta'. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
