On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please note the change of subject.
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>> On 12/19/2014 02:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>>>
>>> What it would do however if we simply did away with the notion of the
>>> IPMC/Incubator/etc., is to return to the notion of pTLPs which were
>>> proposed earlier which I would most wholeheartedly support.
>>
>>
>> Having read more, and understood more, and consumed more coffee ...
>>
>> I wonder if we might implement this proposal with one incoming project, as a
>> test, under close observation by the board and the IPMC? Might be seen as
>> grossly unfair by the project that remain in the old regime (or, who knows,
>> maybe also by the test project), but it might give us some deeper insight
>> into whether this fixes anything?
>
> This is very much what others were suggesting on the thread as well.
> Given that I'll be mentoring Zeppelin, I'd love to use that as a guinea pig.
> Provided, that I'd have some level of collaboration from the board.
> Perhaps between three of us (Chris, Rich and I) this is all we need.
>
> Thoughts?

Any interest in a retroactive retrofit of NiFi?

>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to