On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi! > > at this point we have had a few lively threads > discussing three somewhat different proposals: > #1 mentor re-boot > #2 pTLP > #3 Ross's strawman http://s.apache.org/8eS > it feels to me that all three need additional work > to be done before we can have any reasonable > consensus around them (let alone voting). > > Wearing my chair hat, I would like to suggest that > the next step should be: for each proposal we identify > points that are going to block consensus (AKA would > result in -1 vote if it comes to a vote). I suggest we > do it on the wiki pages themselves (I'll wikify Ross's > proposal tonight). Not editing the wikis but simply > collecting this feedback as the last section in each > proposal. The idea would be to identify all such > points in a week or so. > > Sounds good?
To follow up. Each of the proposals: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Strawman https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2 now has the feedback gathering section at the end. I am done with my personal feedback. Please provide yours. Here's the criteria you can apply when deciding whether to spend time on this or not: imagine that the proposal the way it is written were to come to a vote. If at that point you'd be inclined to vote -1 -- please let us know NOW. Using a VOTE thread as a forcing function for folks to provide feedback would be *really* unfortunate. Also, please try to keep 'deal breakers' section as small as possible (pushing all the non-critical piece of your feedback to the 'suggestions' section). When in doubt (even if it is -0) -- make it go to suggestions. The only items that belong to 'dealbreakers' are the ones that would *strongly* motivate you to vote -1 Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org