There is a case where an CCLA can cover for an SGA If a company donates code to an existing project where the developers of the incoming contributions already have ICLAs and the company has signed CCLA for those contributors that were already in effect at the time the contributions were originally developed then in one previous case I've seen it be agreed that an SGA was unnecessary. For example see this legal-discuss thread:
http://s.apache.org/YPe Rob On 08/02/2015 18:10, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:09 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >wrote: >> And specifically, is there ever a case where a CCLA can cover for a SGA? > >I would seriously doubt it. > >Thanks, >Roman. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
