"if we accept" ... take a position, Ross. The two problems *are* orthogonal. The IPMC can do whatever it likes. A pTLP is a proposal to the Board.
Bertrand would like to see discussion on general@incubator, but that is merely a handy location. It actually has zero to do with the Incubator. Ross: if you believe that a pTLP is somehow tied to the Incubator, then state that. Otherwise, please STOP throwing uncertainty into the waters. -g On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Fair enough. I don't think I ever agreed they are orthogonal. In fact the > only concern I have consistently stated, and is reflected on the summary > below, is that it, potentially, moves the problem rather than solves it. > > That being said, if we accept its orthogonal then your point is a good one. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Roman Shaposhnik<mailto:ro...@shaposhnik.org> > Sent: 2/23/2015 4:49 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > It's not unfair. I deliberately tried to say i don't want to distract > from the handover process. > > I though we all agreed that whatever pTLP is -- it is absolutely 100% > orthogonal to > the process that Incubator is in business of managing. There will be > some overlap > of people involved in both, but we don't need to wait on Incubator to > proceed with > pTLP any more than we'd need to wait on Incubator to do something in > Hadoop land > (although quite a few Hadoop folks are on IPMC). > > > I don't think its productive to make someone's support or otherwise of > an experiment > > to distract from getting the right chair to replace you. > > That would be a fair point if we didn't try as hard as we can to > decouple the two. > > If what you're saying is: currently there's no way for Incubator NOT > to be involved > in pTLP AND if that's the opinion shared by the majority on the board, > I'd have to > re-evaluate things on my end. > > I thought Greg convinced you all that it must be de-coupled. That's what I > based > my calculations on. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
