On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote:

> 3.7 --> That is not default for TLPs, as only PMC members subscribe to
> private@
>
> 3.8 --> Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines.
>
> 3.9 --> Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines.
>
> i.e. what is now written in 3.11 will cover these three points and can be
> removed.
>
>
> The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be worth
while to consider a way for projects that entered  Incubator recently and
has enough (whatever that is) asf members as committers ?

rgds
jan i

>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Niclas!
> >
> > First of all: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9195
> > Hopefully INFRA will respond soon so we can all collaborate
> > on the content. At this point I've started the documentation to
> > the level of details currently on Incubator pages.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > Roman,
> > >
> > > See comments below to
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Provisional+TLP
> > >
> > >
> > > 2.1  --> I suggest to change the word "probationary" to "provisional".
> > > I also suggest that a text is added such as; 'It is required that the
> > > "provisional" concept is explained in detail to the users, for instance
> > by
> > > linking to page http://xxxx' where xxxx is another page on ComDev
> > > explaining pTLP from the user's perspective.
> >
> > Good catch. Done.
> >
> > > I think that 3.7. to 3.9. are really not necessary. I would like to
> > suggest
> > > to change that to;
> >
> > Could you elaborate on why do you think it is not necessary?
> >
> > > Setting up a Provisional Top Level Project
> > >
> > > * Complete Name Search in accordance with Branding policy at
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-names
> > > * Check PMC Chair is recorded in LDAP.
> > > * Request Jira from INFRA
> > > * Request Mailing lists from INFRA
> > > * Add project to Reporting Schedule
> > > * Request source control (svn or git) from INFRA
> > > * Submission of ICLAs from existing committers.
> > > * Submission of CCLAs from affected companies
> > > * IP Clearance as described on
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
> > > * Filing of Software Grant, if applicable.
> > > * Change to Apache License v2.0, if applicable.
> > > * Update Apache Navigation to include project
> > > * Request User Accounts from INFRA
> > > * Request CMS from INFRA
> > > * Migrate existing documentation to Apache.
> > > * Ensure "Provisional" markings are adhered to, and link to http://
> ....
> > > * Enable Notifications from Jira to Mailing list
> > > * Migrate existing codebase to Apache
> > > * Ensure dependency licensing compatibility, see
> > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> > > * Review legal compliance on all dependencies, in particular NOTICE
> file.
> > > * Ensure compliance with Branding policy
> > > * Establish self-assessed Apache Maturity Model declaration.
> >
> > Great list! Added it to the dedicated section and plan to massage it
> > to the level
> > of details of the current Incubator process documentation.
> >
> > Honestly, I think if that level is enough for the board to recognize
> > Incubator
> > as legit it should be enough to recognize a pTLP.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
>


-- 
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.

Reply via email to