Hi general@, I am bringing this VOTE a a close. We have the following RESULT to report.
[13] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation Alan D. Cabrera Chris Mattmann* Benedikt Ritter Lewis J. McGibbney* John D. Ament (Gary is now on board as mentor) Rob Vesse Hadrian Zbarcea Sergio Fernández Henry Saputra* Jan Iversen Andy Seaborne* Stian Soiland-Reyes Marvin Humphrey [0] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay [0] -1 I am not happy with this proposal because.... * IPMC Binding Thank you to everyone that took the time to review the proposal and provide your VOTE. It is greatly appreciated. I apologize if there were more IPMC-binding VOTE's. The VOTE has passed and I am very happy to continue with proposing this to Board via the IPMC as part of the next steps. @Marvin Humphrey, I will ensure that we request INFRA to set up the newer style mailing lists as suggested. Thank you for picking this up and your attention to detail. Best Lewis On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi general@, > > Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a > proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance > into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way through the Incubator > documentation checklists - > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#formulating, we are now > brining this proposal back to the general@ list. > > Commons RDF is a set of interfaces for the RDF 1.1 concepts that can be > used to expose common RDF-1.1 concepts using common Java interfaces. The > current CommondRDFProposal document can be found at - > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CommonsRDFProposal > > This thread is therefore aimed at obtaining general consensus from the > incubator community on whether the proposal document is suitable and > whether the project as described should begin an incubation period at > Apache. > > The VOTE is therefore as follows > > [ ] +1 I am happy with Commons RDF entering incubation > [ ] +0/-0 I am neither yay or nay > [ ] -1 I am not happy with this proposal because.... > > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours. > > p.s. Here is my +1 PPMC binding > > -- > *Lewis* > -- *Lewis*
