On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:08 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Having just skimmed the proposal, that in general look good, one thing > > caught my eye. > > > > The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the > initial > > commiters are only 5. > > This, is a GREAT question! Thank you so much for raising it. While > preparing a proposal I've struggled with the same issue, because looking > at this: https://github.com/groovy/groovy-core/graphs/contributors makes > me wonder exactly the same thing. > > In the end, we decided to go ahead with the proposal the way it is and > position > the initial list of committers more as a PMC for the project. > > That still doesn't answer your (or mine! ;-)) question of what's the best > way > to make sure than anybody who feels like they have a stake in the project > and have contributed in the past get invited. > > There are a few alternatives I could see, but I would really > appreciate Incubator's > collective wisdom on what would be the best way to proceed here given > that Groovy is a very mature project with a lot of contributors in the > past. > Some of whom may or may not wish to keep contributing. Just to be sure I am not misunderstood, I will be happy to vote +1 with 5 initial committers. I was simply (as you) puzzled over what seems to non logical. rgds jan i > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > <javascript:;> > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
