So, in summary, can we all agree that I (Groovy projet lead / representative) can fill in the form, and say "on behalf of the Groovy community", I grant the rights to the ASF?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we are going a bit too far here. > > Groovy has been under the AL 2.0 license since it moves from BSD (back > in 2003). AL 2.0 says : > > " Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor > hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, > royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare > Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and > distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form." > > My understanding is that any groovy contributor, including the 5 initial > commiters, can grant the existing code base to The ASF, per the AL 2.0 > license. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Guillaume Laforge Groovy Project Manager Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
