I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours to give others the opportunity to vote. I’d say give it another day, and be happy it’s likely to pass at this point.
That 72 hour guideline/rule is there to allow everyone a chance to vote. We’re all in different timezones and have differing amounts of time to devote to Apache work. -Taylor On Apr 1, 2015, at 10:41 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > We got more than enough votes at this point (+4 binding). Would anyone have > objections to close the vote today (after 48 hours)? > > D. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:01 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 binding no Aprils fool. >> >> rgds >> jan i >> >> >> On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> I checked: >>> - issues from last release fixed >>> - hashes and signatures correct >>> - has disclaimer >>> - notice and license correct (but see discussion for documentation bug) >>> - all source file have apache header >>> - no unexpected binaries >>> - can compile from source >>> >>> Minor issues. Please consider fixing these for next release. >>> - release not placed on http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator [1] >>> - release has "incubator" not "incubating" in the release name [2] >>> - release notes refer to 1.0 and 1.0 RC3 which is confusing >>> - mention required version of Java / suggested maven_opts >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >>> >>> 1. >> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases >>> 2. >> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> <javascript:;> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> <javascript:;> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
