Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >>...can you clarify what you mean by "use >> those trademarks”? > > By use I just mean have them appear in the existing text as they currently > do. Obviously > the missing attributions would also need to be added...
So IIUC the donated docs that will eventually be published at http://flex.apache.org/ include mentions of trademarks that we do not own. In my opinion mentioning such trademarks in documentation is perfectly ok as long as we acknowledge them, I don't see how that could cause harm to their owner. So I suppose if those docs mention Flex and Foo, you just need to add a note that Apache Flex is our trademark, and Foo is a trademark of <whoever owns it>. Where there might be a problem is for other modules that were donated to Flex in the meantime, without providing an explicit trademark donation - their name might need to be changed in Flex, if we don't own the corresponding trademarks. But that's not directly related to this issue IIUC. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
