On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes that was my analysis of the question: If I decide to produce an > unofficial binary release of Maven without the approval of the rest of the > PMC, I may not call it Maven. If I did call it Maven then the remainder of > the PMC would be responsible for sending me a C&D. > Well, if "Debian" can publish their built Apache Maven as "maven" and "Steve&Nick" can't publish their built Apache Maven as "maven", then the inescapable question is; On what non-arbitrary grounds is one acceptable and the other is not? It can't be "we like Debian, but not Steve&Nick", that is morally weak. Niclas
