On 11/02/2015 01:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:25AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
>On 11/01/2015 07:48 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >Thanks for sending this around, Paul - I should've linked it to the vote
> >thread, duh...
> >
> >Anyway, back to Rich's question: the answer is 'yes' as implied by my +1 on
> >the vote. Why would I be voting for the graduation if I weren't sure the
> >project is ready? Looks like a rhetorical question, this one.
>
>No, it's not a rhetorical question at all. I suspect, as I have
>mentioned in other threads, that some people vote +1 on these things
>without doing a whole lot of background checking. Paul's response is
>what I was looking for.
>
>If it's all just rhetorical questions then why do we bother at all?
>Graduation is a one-time thing. We can afford to apply a little
>additional scrutiny to it. This is something we can't afford to get
>wrong.
The one I called rhetorical was actually my last quesiton, not yours.
Right. That's the one I was referring to also.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
